WikiLeaks: Stop the crackdown
Avaaz.org
Illustratie: Luis Ricardo Falero
The massive campaign of intimidation against WikiLeaks is sending a chill through free press advocates everywhere.
Legal experts say WikiLeaks has likely broken no laws. Yet top US politicians have called it a terrorist group and commentators have urged assassination of its staff. The organization has come under massive government and corporate attack, but WikiLeaks is only publishing information provided by a whistleblower. And it has partnered with the world’s leading newspapers (NYT, Guardian, Spiegel etc) to carefully vet the information it publishes.
The massive extra-judicial intimidation of WikiLeaks is an attack on democracy. We urgently need a public outcry for freedom of the press and expression. Sign the petition to stop the crackdown — let’s get to 1 million voices and take out full page ads in US newspapers this week!
WikiLeaks isn’t acting alone — it’s partnered with the top newspapers in the world (New York Times, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, etc) to carefully review 250,000 US diplomatic cables and remove any information that it is irresponsible to publish. Only 800 cables have been published so far. Past WikiLeaks publications have exposed government-backed torture, the murder of innocent civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, and corporate corruption.
The US government is currently pursuing all legal avenues to stop WikiLeaks from publishing more cables, but the laws of democracies protect freedom of the press. The US and other governments may not like the laws that protect our freedom of expression, but that’s exactly why it’s so important that we have them, and why only a democratic process can change them.
Reasonable people can disagree on whether WikiLeaks and the leading newspapers it’s partnered with are releasing more information than the public should see. Whether the releases undermine diplomatic confidentiality and whether that’s a good thing. Whether WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has the personal character of a hero or a villain. But none of this justifies a vicious campaign of intimidation to silence a legal media outlet by governments and corporations.
Ever wonder why the media so rarely gives the full story of what happens behind the scenes? This is why – because when they do, governments can be vicious in their response. And when that happens, it’s up to the public to stand up for our democratic rights to a free press and freedom of expression. Never has there been a more vital time for us to do so.
With hope,
Ricken, Emma, Alex, Alice, Maria Paz and the rest of the Avaaz team.
SOURCES:
* Law experts say WikiLeaks in the clear (ABC)
* WikiLeaks are a bunch of terrorists, says leading U.S. congressman (Mail Online)
* Cyber guerrillas can help US (Financial Times)
* Amazon drops WikiLeaks under political pressure (Yahoo)
* “WikiLeaks avenged by hacktivists” (PC World)
* US Gov shows true control over Internet with WikiLeaks containment (Tippett.org)
* US embassy cables culprit should be executed, says Mike Huckabee (The Guardian)
* WikiLeaks ditched by MasterCard, Visa. Who’s next? (The Christian Science Monitor)
* Assange’s Interpol Warrant Is for Having Sex Without a Condom (The Slatest)
Support the Avaaz community! We’re entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations. Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way — donate here.
Avaaz.org is a 6.4-million-person global campaign network that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 13 countries on 4 continents and operates in 14 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.
Algemeen, English, 09.12.2010 @ 09:08
6 Reacties
op 09 12 2010 at 09:37 schreef Tweets die vermelden Frontaal Naakt. » WikiLeaks: Stop the crackdown -- Topsy.com:
[…] Dit blogartikel was vermeld op Twitter door senomar, Erwin Verbeek, senomar, Jaymaroley, Ton Ebben en anderen. Ton Ebben heeft gezegd: RT @FrontaalNaakt: WikiLeaks: stop the crackdown, sign the petition; let's get to 1 million voices: http://tinyurl.com/2eopt76 […]
op 09 12 2010 at 16:54 schreef sabaroth:
Oh mijn god, die gozer is schuldig aan “Sex by surprise”, nou snap ik dat interpol hem zoekt.
op 09 12 2010 at 17:25 schreef MNb:
Intimidatie is natuurlijk niet leuk. En het gedrag van diverse overheden en financiële instellingen verdient beslist geen schoonheidsprijs. Maar als we de publicaties van Wikileaks alleen op zijn juridische merites moeten beoordelen geldt dat ook voor die overheden. En die hebben voor zover ik weet niets illegaals tegen Wikileaks gedaan.
Vooralsnog zie ik geen reden om die petitie te tekenen. Maar ik behoud mij uitdrukkelijk het recht voor van mening te veranderen.
op 09 12 2010 at 18:05 schreef babs:
Interessant een tijdje te kijken waar de ondertekenaars vandaan komen. Opvallend weinig Amerikanen. Ik zie meer Canadezen, Mexicanen en Brzilianen voorbij komen.
Dit kan wel eens gaan uitdraaien op een VS tegen de rest van de wereld. Ik vermoed dat bedrijven als PayPal, Visa en Mastercard niet goed in de gaten hebben hoe verkeerd dit valt in de rest van de wereld. Dure vergissing.
op 09 12 2010 at 20:54 schreef Bert Brussen:
@sabaroth: in Zweden hebben ze nogal merkwaardige zedenwetten, vandaar dat nu zoiets mogelijk is. Als man die wordt beschuldigd van seksuele intimidatie ben je meestal automatisch de lul in Zweden.
Nou moet ik ook zeggen dat Assange ook wel heel erg de verkeerde vrouw heeft liggen nakken. Dat ene wijf is nog hysterischer dan alle Mirte Hylkes en Stine Jensens bij elkaar.
op 12 12 2010 at 14:31 schreef sabaroth:
Heb ik nog mazzel gehad, ik heb er een paar genaaid zonder condoom daar, had ik dus vet de bak voor kunnen indraaien blijkbaar.